Evaluasi Kinerja Penyisihan Kekeruhan dan Penggunaan PAC dalam Operasional Harian di SPAM Katulampa, Kota Bogor

Authors

  • Niesa Hanum Mistoro Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Jalan Kaliurang Km.14,5, Yogyakarta 55584 Indonesia Author
  • Enry Adiarto Guntoro Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Jalan Kaliurang Km.14,5, Yogyakarta 55584 Indonesia Author
  • Noviani Ima Wantoputri Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Jalan Kaliurang Km.14,5, Yogyakarta 55584 Indonesia Author
  • Dahlia Anggita Zahra Economics, Planning and Public Policy Program, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo 106-0032, Japan Author
  • Makmur Gunawan Perumda Tirta Pakuan Kota Bogor, Jl. Siliwangi No. 121, Sukasari, Bogor Timur, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat 16142 Author
  • Muhammad Yacob Perumda Tirta Pakuan Kota Bogor, Jl. Siliwangi No. 121, Sukasari, Bogor Timur, Kota Bogor, Jawa Barat 16142 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52759/reactor.v7i1.90

Keywords:

drinking water treatment, turbidity, Polyaluminum Chloride, coagulation-floculation, SPAM Katulampa

Abstract

This study evaluates turbidity removal performance and daily Polyaluminum Chloride (PAC) use at SPAM Katulampa, Bogor, based on routine operational data under fluctuating raw water turbidity. Daily operational data from 10 February to 10 March 2026 were analysed, including raw water turbidity, treated water turbidity, PAC consumption, and flow rate. Descriptive statistics, time-series plots, turbidity removal calculation, and exploratory scatter plots with linear trendlines were used to assess treatment stability and the relationship between PAC use and turbidity. Raw water turbidity varied widely from 12.00 to 262.97 NTU, while treated water turbidity remained low at 0.52–0.91 NTU, below the 3 NTU national turbidity limit. Turbidity removal ranged from 94.9% to 99.8%, indicating stable performance of the treatment process. Daily PAC use ranged from 324.75 to 519.60 kg/day. However, the linear relationships between raw water turbidity and PAC use (R² = 0.0148), and between PAC use and treated water turbidity (R² = 0.0021), were very weak. The results indicate that low treated-water turbidity was maintained despite high raw-water variability, but this stability cannot be attributed solely to PAC use. It is more appropriately understood as the combined performance of coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, and routine operational control. Higher-resolution operational data are needed to evaluate real-time PAC dose response and process optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. H. Organization, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2017.

P. Jarvis, B. Jefferson, and S. A. Parsons, “The Role of Coagulation in Water Treatment,” Water Res., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 188–198, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.07.034.

L. Lin and W. Ika, “Enhanced Coagulation of Low Turbid Water for Drinking Water Treatment: Dosing Approach on Floc Formation and Residuals Minimization,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1021–1033, 2019, doi: 10.1089/ees.2018.0430.

X. Ji, Z. Li, M. Wang, Z. Yuan, and L. Jin, “Response Surface Methodology Approach to Optimize Parameters for Coagulation Process Using Polyaluminum Chloride (PAC),” Water (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1470, 2024, doi: 10.3390/w16111470.

D. Setyaningsih, “Comparative Study of Coagulants,” Jurnal Teknik Kimia UPN Jatim, 2002.

A. Chiavola, “A combined experimental-modeling approach for turbidity removal optimization in a coagulation--flocculation unit of a drinking water treatment plant,” J. Process Control, p. 103068, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2023.103068.

H. Ratnaweera and J. Fettig, “State of the Art of Online Monitoring and Control of the Coagulation Process,” Water (Basel)., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 6574–6597, 2015, doi: 10.3390/w7116574.

A. Matilainen, M. Vepsäläinen, and M. Sillanpää, “Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 159, pp. 189–197, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007.

A. T. Salem and N. O. A. Al-Musawi, “Water Treatment With Conventional and Alternative Coagulants: A Review,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 20–28, 2021, doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2021.09.02.

D. Wang, J. Wu, L. Deng, Z. Li, and Y. Wang, “A real-time optimization control method for coagulation process during drinking water treatment,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 3271–3283, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11071-021-06794-5.

B. News, “Terhenti Akibat Kekeruhan Tinggi, SPAM Katulampa Kembali Beroperasi,” 2026.

A. International, ASTM D7726 – Standard Guide for The Use of Various Turbidimeter Technologies for Measurement of Turbidity in Water. ASTM, 2013.

APHA, AWWA, and W. E. F, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2017.

I. O. for Standardization, ISO 7027-1:2016 – Water quality — Determination of turbidity — Part 1: Quantitative methods. ISO, 2016.

A. Rezaldie and S. Yustiani, “Operational Evaluation of Water Treatment Plant: Case Study in Indonesia,” Journal of Applied Water Research, 2025.

R. Maulida and M. Sulaiman, “Evaluasi Operasional dan Pemeliharaan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum (SPAM) Kampus UGM,” Yogyakarta, ID, 2019.

T. Prayogo, “Operational Practices and Maintenance in Drinking Water Supply System,” 2016.

A. Water Works Association, “Operational Control of Coagulation and Filtration Processes AWWA MANUAL M37 Third Edition,” 2011.

F. Z. Harun, F. K. Rahmawati, and N. I. R. Umadji, “Analisis Parameter Kekeruhan Pada Sistem Pengolahan Air Baku di Kota Gorontalo,” J. Environ. Eng. Res., 2025.

F. Mahdariza, “The Influence of Production Flow Rate and Raw Water Turbidity on Distributed Water Turbidity at Lambaro WTP,” Elkawnie: J. Isl. Sci. Technol., 2014.

L. Wang, F. Ma, C. Pang, and S. Firdoz, “Multicausal analysis on water deterioration processes present in a drinking water treatment system,” Water Environ. Res., 2013.

V. Gauthier, “Impact of raw water turbidity fluctuations on drinking water quality in a distribution system,” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 2003.

Widya Sabila,et al. “Analysis of Physical and Chemical Parameters in the Raw Water Processing at Perumda Tirtanadi Sunggal,” PROMOTOR, 2025.

K. K. R. Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 492/Menkes/Per/IV/2010 dan acuan 2021 tentang Baku Mutu Air Minum,” Kementerian Kesehatan RI, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2021.

L. Zhang and et al., “Treatment of high turbidity water through plain and coagulated up-flow roughing filter,” Desalination Water Treat., vol. 52, pp. 1035–1043, 2014.

R. Ridwan, R. Afrianita, and Y. Gustina, “The Effect of Variation in Cone Position Height on Raw Water Turbidity Removal in Sedimentation Unit Continuous Discharge Flow (CDF) Method as a New Method,” J. Ilmu Lingkungan, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 2022.

T. Alfiah, B. P. Winata, and R. D. Afrianisa, “Hubungan Ketebalan Media Saringan Pasir Cepat dengan Efisiensi Penurunan Kekeruhan,” Envitats, Environmental Eng. J. ITATS, 2021.

A. K. Ibrahim, “Effect of the Horizontal Perforated Plates on the Turbidity Removal Efficiency in Water Treatment Plant of Tikrit University,” Tikrit J. Eng. Sci., vol. 26, no. 4, 2019.

W. N. Rezaldie and Y. M. Yustiani, “Evaluasi Kinerja Operasional dan Strategi Pemeliharaan Instalasi Pengolahan Air Minum Berbasis Kepatuhan Regulasi (Studi Kasus: IPA X),” INFOMATEK: Jurnal Informatika, Manajemen dan Teknologi, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2025, doi: 10.23969/infomatek.v27i2.41585.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles